Why social media has become a mental health minefield after the Charlie Kirk shooting

In the aftermath of Charlie Kirk's assassination at Utah Valley University, social media platforms have transformed into battlegrounds of grief, rage, and political division.

"I'm Shay McAlister, and this is Shay Informed: an independent, ad-free platform dedicated to honest journalism with compassion and clarity.

Are you new here? Sign up for the free newsletter or subscribe to support our mission.

The Charlie Kirk shooting has left many of us feeling like we're drowning in a sea of anger, grief, and political chaos online. It feels impossible to look away, doesn't it? Every notification pulls you back in, every scroll brings another heated argument or graphic image you wish you hadn't seen.

But here's the thing- you don't have to be a passive victim of the algorithm. You can't control what other people post or how social media companies design their platforms, but you absolutely can control what shows up on your screen and how much of your mental energy you give away each day.

I'm not suggesting you stick your head in the sand or pretend terrible things aren't happening in the world. That's not realistic or responsible. What I'm talking about is learning to consume news and social media in a way that keeps you informed without making you feel like you're losing your mind.

The perfect storm of digital toxicity

The Charlie Kirk shooting represents a convergence of everything that makes social media particularly harmful during national tragedies. According to mental health experts, there are three key factors exacerbating an already tense situation.

1. Graphic content with context

The shooting video has circulated largely without content warnings or context. Some social media users found the footage unexpectedly while scrolling through their normal feeds, creating a form of digital ambush that mirrors the psychological impact of witnessing violence firsthand.

2. Political weaponization of tragedy

Within hours of Kirk's death, the incident became a rallying cry for both sides of the political divide. Some users have celebrated the shooting, some pushed for the same coverage/outcry as recent school shootings, while others expressed outrage and deemed it an attack on free speech. This immediate politicization prevents healthy collective grieving and instead transforms the tragedy into ammunition for ongoing culture wars.

3. Algorithmic amplification

Social media algorithms, designed to maximize engagement, have inadvertently created echo chambers that amplify the most extreme reactions to Kirk's death. Users find themselves trapped in feedback loops of increasingly inflammatory content, whether celebrating or mourning the activist's death. This algorithmic bias toward controversy means moderate voices calling for reflection and de-escalation are often drowned out.

The mental health tsunami

Mental health professionals are now warning of a surge in patients experiencing anxiety, depression, and trauma symptoms directly linked to social media consumption following the shooting.

Even users who didn't know Kirk personally report experiencing genuine grief and trauma symptoms after repeatedly encountering the shooting video and related content. This phenomenon, known as "secondary trauma," can be particularly intense when the victim represents something meaningful to the viewer- whether that's political ideology, age, or family status.

It's not just Kirk's shooting death that is sending shock waves through the nation. Yet another school shooting has forced parents into an anxiety spiral.

There have been 47 school shootings in the United States so far this year, as of September 10, according to the Gun Violence Archive.

Twenty-four were on college campuses, and 23 were on K-12 school grounds. The incidents left 19 people dead and at least 77 other victims injured.

Perhaps most concerning is the emerging pattern of compassion fatigue among heavy social media users. After days of consuming extreme content related to the shootings, mental health experts warn that people can become emotionally numb or unable to process additional tragic news. This psychological defense mechanism, while protective in the short term, can lead to long-term emotional detachment and difficulty forming meaningful connections.

Expert-backed digital self-defense strategies for mental health

Based on research from mental health professionals, digital wellness experts, and major health organizations, here are evidence-based strategies for protecting your mental health during traumatic news cycles and social media crises.

Digital detox and time management- Take regular breaks from digital devices and turn off notifications (Johns Hopkins Children's Center)

Selective following and unfollowing- be selective about who you connect with. Follow people who inspire you or leave you with positive feelings. If someone posts inflammatory content, expresses views you disagree with, or posts material that makes you feel bad about yourself, unfollow them (HelpGuide mental health experts)

Content warnings and filters- many platforms now offer tools that allow you to hide or limit exposure to certain content. (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services)

Digital sunset- avoiding screens before bedtime helps protect sleep quality and mental well-being. If you have a hard time resisting your phone, try to keep it out of sight in a different room or out of easy reach. (HelpGuide mental health experts)

Fact-checking before sharing- social media can also be a hive of misinformation, conspiracy theories, and negativity. Always double-check sources before believing or forwarding posts that make controversial claims, especially if they're likely to cause distress to others. (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services)

The path forward

When tragedies like this happen, social media becomes this weird battleground where you see both the absolute worst and the most beautiful parts of humanity playing out in real time. The trick is learning to engage with the good stuff while protecting yourself from the toxic waste. It's about showing up as your best self for the conversations that matter, instead of getting dragged into every fight that pops up in your feed.

Our democracy really does depend on our ability to talk through difficult, painful topics without completely destroying ourselves in the process. And that starts with each of us taking responsibility for our own mental health and digital habits.

You've got this- you just need the right tools and boundaries in place.

Like what you see? Learn more about Shay Informed here! This is honest journalism with compassion and clarity.