Nick Houck's attorney wants to know: What exactly did he lie about?
A new filing asks prosecutors to point to one lie among 33 recordings- before this case reaches a jury.
"I'm Shay McAlister, and this is Shay Informed: an independent, ad-free platform dedicated to honest journalism with compassion and clarity.
Are you new here? Sign up for the free weekly newsletter or subscribe to support our mission and access behind-the-scenes content, podcasts, and in-depth stories reserved for paid subscribers.
Nick Houck's defense team just filed something that gets at the heart of the perjury case against him: a demand that prosecutors say, in plain terms, which of the 33 recordings in this case actually contains the lie.
Attorney Michael Ferguson filed a "Notice Motion Bill of Particulars" Monday in Nelson Circuit Court on behalf of Houck. In plain English, a bill of particulars is a formal request asking the Commonwealth to spell out the specifics of its case- not just the legal charge, but the who, what, when, and where behind it.
Here's what Ferguson is asking Judge Charles Simms to force prosecutors to answer:
In short: Houck is charged with one Class D felony count of perjury, but the underlying case spans years of evidence, and the defense says it's still not clear which single statement is actually at issue.